Just because She's Topless

[RoadRunner79]

-asked the man who was just asking where the harm was in sexual assault, who insists that the innocent sex offender in question was the real victim of a punchy bitch.

You, RR, it's you, lol.  You're the one who maintained that sex crime is only harmful as a matter of differing opinion.  Would you like to walk that back now? Is there anything else in this thread you'd like to walk back?  May as well do it all at once.

As you said... I was the one who was asking questions.  Specifically about the objective harm, according to a view you have espoused previously.   Just because you didn't answer, don't' blame me.  Do you understand the differences between questions and statements? 

Now perhaps others could have missed it, but the statements I made, said specifically, that I believe that what was done was wrong.    At what point do you start to question the intellectual integrity of someone who continues to distort the picture, when they have been corrected.  Because I think we are getting there.  It's kind of sad, because apparently you don't even understand why I was asking the questions.