(January 4, 2018 at 6:45 pm)Jane2d Wrote:(January 4, 2018 at 5:06 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: BTW, those NDAs likely run afoul of federal whistleblower laws. (Unless we are talking about bona fide classified material - but we aren't.)
ALSO - the fact that they're going after it under the umbrella of an NDA, that strongly implies that there is truth to the book. (i.e. if you disclose things that are false, there is no issue under an NDA.)
Please explain to me how you think this NDA runs afoul of fed whistleblower.
NDA typically have a "any employment related info you wish to make public must be approved by our company prior to release" [paraphrase]. How does this imply a 'truth to the book'?
The government is not a company and cannot muzzle you over wrongdoing that you observed, per federal law.
