RE: The WLB Has Not Thought This Out....
January 4, 2018 at 11:37 pm
(This post was last modified: January 4, 2018 at 11:43 pm by Jane2d.)
(January 4, 2018 at 11:16 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(January 4, 2018 at 6:45 pm)Jane2d Wrote: Please explain to me how you think this NDA runs afoul of fed whistleblower.
NDA typically have a "any employment related info you wish to make public must be approved by our company prior to release" [paraphrase]. How does this imply a 'truth to the book'?
The government is not a company and cannot muzzle you over wrongdoing that you observed, per federal law.
What wrong doing? There is no law broken by DJT jr meeting up with russians prior to the election. There is no law broken AFTER the election either. Of the indictments handed down so far, NOT one law broken by the trump campaign in regards to the election process so far that we are aware of. BTW, that (jr meeting up) was long before the election meaning fed whistle blower DOES NOT APPLY. Trump typically has employees sign NDAs which would have been Bannon prior to the swearing in. So if he was putting out info on what appears to be legal campaign activities, I do believe a NDA signed by him is valid. Something along the lines of Proprietary Information.
(January 4, 2018 at 11:26 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Accept it's right on my profile . No need to search the engine .
That is something I seldom do. Will keep this in mind.
