(January 9, 2018 at 7:52 am)Khemikal Wrote:(January 8, 2018 at 10:47 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: And the question stil. Is how did you come to that conclusion?
You're suddenly less confident in the majority position of biblical scholarship? Or are you questioning the epilepsy comments towards the end? I always find that one amusing, myself. It's only a thing because people try to explain why a person might see or experience whats contained within magic book. Paul didn't have epileptic seizures. There was no Paul. He didn't see shit. That's just another part of the story.
What do you mean "no Paul"? Or is this a rhetorical thing?