RE: Aziz Ansari Doesn't Pick Up On "Non-Verbal Cues" and Gets Treated Like A Rapist
January 19, 2018 at 1:48 pm
(This post was last modified: January 19, 2018 at 1:55 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(January 19, 2018 at 1:43 pm)alpha male Wrote: He's wrong about the agenda thing, but considering the things said about theists here, I don't see that it's as big a deal as is being made out.
Trust me, if it was the likes of Tazzicon, Succubus, or Astonished saying this, I wouldn't care one bit. I'd actually have a good chuckle, as I usually do when they spew their obnoxious BS my way. But it's upsetting to me in this instance because it's coming from someone I've respected and interacted with on a personal level.
(January 19, 2018 at 1:45 pm)Shell B Wrote: Whateverist, even if someone has a religious agenda (read: religious background), that doesn't make their posts less genuine. I've seen less-than-genuine posts, and they usually start with something like, "I despise arguing, but . . . " or "I'm not racist, but . . ."
Thump said that I made that one comment in an attempt to "advance my faith," and that's what he means by me having an "agenda". And that he knows this based on my past posting history.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
