(January 20, 2018 at 5:44 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(January 20, 2018 at 5:42 pm)polymath257 Wrote: Sorry, your argument fails starting at #3. it gets much worse after that.
What is the problem with 3? If we have no idea how the brain can generate morals and make goodness binding on us, we don't know it's not an illusion.
What if it's a chaotic process that is just makes us feel good and cooperate but has no reality? And that we all dispute about it because of that?
Let's see a real problem with this premise. Remember people didn't understand chemistry all that like today, so none of that could justify it in the past.
No Poly, MK's argument failed from #1.
Argument from complexity is NOT an argument. It isn't when Christians or Jews try to argue complexity either. Dont feed MK, he is in the same boat as Roadrunner or Catholic Lady.