(January 21, 2018 at 4:43 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(January 20, 2018 at 9:56 pm)Grandizer Wrote: No, Brian, this is terrible logic. Nothing logically wrong with Premise 1. I don't care about your agenda. When something is logical, it is logical. Of course, his whole argument fails at the end, but that is besides the point.
"Agenda"? What? That is laughable.
There is NO agenda whatsoever in stating an observation that EVERY religion in the world, has apologists whom all make the same arguments. I never said every member does, but every label has members that do, to some extent, greater or lesser.
I didn't uncover evolution, DARWIN DID. Scientists since went on to uncover DNA which backs that up. Our brains have allowed us to have a more complex language, but when theists makes that the ARGUMENT, they fail, because what they really want is for that to point to their specific club. Scientific method is a NEUTRAL TOOL, or I should say, should be treated as neutral, and apologists OF EVERY label worldwide hate that it is not bias pointing to their specific club labels.
If you hear a Muslim, Christian or Jew, or Hindu or Buddhist say, "life is complex" or, "A monkey could not write Shakespeare" they are not arguing science, they are arguing theology. Some do accept science sure, but only until it conflicts with the mythology and superstitions they fell for.
And here you go again being all over the place with random shit. Its like one cant have a steady and rational discourse with you at all as soon as someone brings up religion.
