RE: A problem with the word "atheist"
January 24, 2018 at 1:32 am
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2018 at 1:39 am by possibletarian.)
(January 23, 2018 at 8:53 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Dawkins suggested atheists call themselves "brights". Which, to me, is a stupid idea.
I suggest we use "not dumbfucks".
Too harsh for today's delicate society, i suggest ''dumfuckerly challenged''
(January 23, 2018 at 10:24 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Theists make such a big deal about not believing in all Gods but one vs not believing in any at all. One might think they'd be a tad more enlightened about disbelieving God claims.
Makes a big diffy poo when it's the one they've homed in on though.
Yes i think that too, you would think they understood not believing in gods very well.
I don't subscribe to the 'they are atheists to every other god' claim mind, i think the mindset is different, and rather abuses the meaning of atheist.
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
