A problem with the word "atheist"

[LadyForCamus]

I dunno...establish integrity?  I mean, if you’re here to counter bad arguments in the name of logic, I’d think you’d want to be countering all of them, regardless of which side they come from.

 

I already explained that I do counter arguments from both sides, it's just that the majority of my disagreements with theists  here are political, not so much religious. So how about we finish addressing God's existence before we start arguing any religious doctrine.

Sure.  Would you like to make an argument for god’s existence?  I’m all ears.

It’s not that hard, really.  There is no evidence for any god, therefore I have no rational reason to believe one exists.
False analogy.  We actually have evidence of life existing here, now don’t we?

How is that a false analogy? Are you saying you believe in extraterrestrial life because life exists on earth?

I didn’t say anything about what I believed.  I said it’s a false analogy, because it is. We have demonstrable evidence of life, Huggy.  We know what biological conditions are necessary to support it.  We know that there are other galaxies, solar systems, suns and planets that exist outside of our own.  We are in possession of this referential, reality-based evidence, so it’s not that hard to posit a statistical probability about life elsewhere in the universe.  On the other hand, we have zero physical evidence of your god, or any other god; that it is, or could ever be.

So then how can you not believe that because life exists in this dimension it can exist in other dimensions?

What now?  What does that have to do with evidence for the existence of god?  

Two years at this forum, and I haven’t been presented with even a meager shred of evidence to make me to think otherwise.  If a Theist can come to me with something, I’m all ears.



LOL.  I don’t know why I bother.  Yes, thank you, actually, for linking to that stupid thread so that anyone following along can check out your earth-shattering evidence of light.

Again as I have explained many times, if you were to take a picture of a being from another dimension it would appear to you as gibberish.

What's interesting though is the eyewitness account of Marilyn Hickey whom described a light that looked like a "wheel within a wheel" at 2:05 in the video.

---

---

That is exactly how you'd describe a 4th dimensional object.

I’m not rehashing this idiotic argument with you.  You linked to the original thread.  That’s more than enough.  People can go down that rabbit hole if they’re in the mood for a crippling migraine.

Actually, unless I’m misremembering , it seems you’ve added to it since then. Do you know what an ad hoc hypothesis is?