Homosexuality

[Amarok]

You see, unlike you, I at least provide receipts to show why I take a certain position? If you think there isn't a disproportionate amount of sexual abuse in the backgrounds or that drawing a correlation between sexual abuse and homosexuality is just dumb, then how about posting a source that we can examine instead of just basically saying nuh-huh.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912575/


https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles...i-anti-gay

Your sources depict bullying, primarily, and do not give any support that most gay people have that orientation due to sexual abuse.
Astreja has answered your nlm study better than I ever could.  And sexually-abused lesbians?  Most females have been sexually abused.  It's the world we live in.
And OF COURSE gay children are bullied.  Wow.  High school is still hell for gays and lesbians, and back when I went to school?  Much, much worse than today.
We can clearly see why you're taking "a certain position" and providing celebrity examples and dubious research.
You want to establish your already held belief that homosexuals are "less than" and damaged (because calling them nasty evil perverts is frowned upon these days).

You still need a study to prove that the majority of homosexuals are victims of SEXUAL ABUSE.

---

It's possible that even without being "out," and before having any sense of sexual orientation, the victims were marginalized and bullied because their behaviours or interests or some other personality trait came across as nonstandard.  (For example, I could never grok "girl things" like playing with dolls and just didn't fit in with my female peers.)

^^^^  no shit Sherlock ^^^  Any high school kid that isn't into dating, a guy that isn't a jock, a girl who isn't girly - they practically have huge KICK ME signs on their backs.

Yup and he won't produce said study or he will hyper focus on one sentence in contrast to the rest of the article . It's wolf inbreeding argument all over again.