So you make the leap of faith FIRST and then reason it afterwards?....Well...are these reasons afterwards valid in and of themselves? In which case they would be evidence and therefore you wouldn't need faith?
And if they're not valid then it's just empty...it's just faith...believing without any evidence (and therefore without any valid reasons to believe God actually exists)...
So whether the faith comes first or after...if there's valid reasons then it's evidence and you don't need faith...if there ISN'T then it's just irrational.
EvF
And if they're not valid then it's just empty...it's just faith...believing without any evidence (and therefore without any valid reasons to believe God actually exists)...
So whether the faith comes first or after...if there's valid reasons then it's evidence and you don't need faith...if there ISN'T then it's just irrational.
EvF