It's a common by-product of love I think. I do not think love depends on it though. I think IT depends on love. And love would be better off without it. Compassion is more important than attachment. Commitment is a by-product of love not the other way around I think. I think commitment is merely a COMMON way for people to express their love - commitment is a deliberate form of expressing love which is a by-product of attachment which in turn is I think a negative by product of love. I think commitment is just a common form of expressing true love. But not the best.
So commitment is also therefore a common INDICATION of true love. But I still think love is better off without it. As I said - commitment is a form of attachment (negative) rather than compassion (positive). Commitment is a product of Love not the other way around (so it does not follow that love isn't better without it, commitment could just be a negative by-product of POSITIVE love - but is also a COMMON expression of true love (so actually an INDICATION of true love perhaps) - but not necessarily the best. Could be better without it).
Well that is my view anyway as I have said lol. With or without the experience. It's what I think.
EvF
So commitment is also therefore a common INDICATION of true love. But I still think love is better off without it. As I said - commitment is a form of attachment (negative) rather than compassion (positive). Commitment is a product of Love not the other way around (so it does not follow that love isn't better without it, commitment could just be a negative by-product of POSITIVE love - but is also a COMMON expression of true love (so actually an INDICATION of true love perhaps) - but not necessarily the best. Could be better without it).
Well that is my view anyway as I have said lol. With or without the experience. It's what I think.
EvF
