Throughout the video, he goes on and on about consciousness and how we cannot really explain it other that the electro-chemical process occuring in the brain. He then goes on to say that that must mean we are eternal.
What...?
Theat conclusion does not follow from your premises, it is just an answer on a whim to explain the unknown, just like God.
This has no evidence. As a matter of fact it relies on the fact that there isn't any evidence for it because then there would be no need to make things up. We haven't found anything like a soul in the human body. Why put your faith in something so obviously impossible to prove?
That just make you another fool.
Articulate your argument better and try again, then time with some feeling. It was hard to hear you and sad to say it was really boring.
What...?
Theat conclusion does not follow from your premises, it is just an answer on a whim to explain the unknown, just like God.
This has no evidence. As a matter of fact it relies on the fact that there isn't any evidence for it because then there would be no need to make things up. We haven't found anything like a soul in the human body. Why put your faith in something so obviously impossible to prove?
That just make you another fool.
Articulate your argument better and try again, then time with some feeling. It was hard to hear you and sad to say it was really boring.
My conclusion is that there is no reason to believe any of the dogmas of traditional theology and, further, that there is no reason to wish that they were true.
Man, in so far as he is not subject to natural forces, is free to work out his own destiny. The responsibility is his, and so is the opportunity.
-Bertrand Russell
Man, in so far as he is not subject to natural forces, is free to work out his own destiny. The responsibility is his, and so is the opportunity.
-Bertrand Russell
