Are Atheists using Intellectually Dishonest Arguments?

[Ravenshire]

Because i'm not saying that it's false ' I'm saying it has yet to be justified .

Yes but this is just one topic. Could you agree that the burden of proof doesn't exempt one to make an argument but obliges him to make it ?

So, if the state claims you committed a murder, do you share an equal burden to prove you're innocent? No, because you're not making the positive claim.

I see your point , but what bothers me is that some just use this to avoid providing an argument wich in fact is contradictory. I think the burden of proof is a statement that clearly says people should back up their stance with an argument.

That is exactly what it is.

Apparently neither of you actually understands the burden of proof.