Ok. ok :p I see your point! 
You're trying to discount my second level evidence as impossible because I've said faith cannot have evidence. (1st level = evidence or proof; 2nd level = non empirical evidence or evidence not based on proof)
For that to work you need evidence to equal non empirical evidence (Richard Dawkins inspired definition BTW) in the area of proof. What separates the two definitions is proof.
You're trying to discount my second level evidence as impossible because I've said faith cannot have evidence. (1st level = evidence or proof; 2nd level = non empirical evidence or evidence not based on proof)
For that to work you need evidence to equal non empirical evidence (Richard Dawkins inspired definition BTW) in the area of proof. What separates the two definitions is proof.
