Are Atheists using Intellectually Dishonest Arguments?

[Succubus]

You can look it up.... but both sides can have a burden of proof if they are both making competing claims. I’m not surprised though that you think the burden of proof doesn’t apply to you.  It explains a lot actually.

Also... you don’t just automatically go with the simplest idea no matter what.... I don’t think you understand this either.

Didn't we have a brief exchange yesterday on this subject where you agreed that your understanding of the BoP was flawed? And here we are again.

---

This cannot be emphasised enough. So many people make complete arse's of themselves by not understanding what Occam's razor actually states.

Do not multiply beyond necessity! Or don’t add unnecessary things (keep it simple)

You're equivocating! As the man just said, and I quote:

"Well, I don't think you understand the difference between "simplest" and "most parsimonious".

The words parsimony, and simple, are not synonymous.