Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 14, 2024, 11:27 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are Atheists using Intellectually Dishonest Arguments?
RE: Are Atheists using Intellectually Dishonest Arguments?
(March 12, 2018 at 9:59 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:
(March 12, 2018 at 8:47 pm)SteveII Wrote: Let me know if I totally misunderstood your point.

You know, Steve, I actually think we see eye to eye here on the big picture. I could accuse you of lawyering. (Why doesn't the OT tell stories about Chinese people from the ancient world who opened their hearts and minds to Yahweh? I didn't know that Job wasn't a Jew, and that was interesting to learn. But neither was he an aboriginal Australian. Just like Zeus was concerned chiefly with people situated around the Mediterranean, Yahweh is concerned with ancient tribesman around the Middle East. You can find a few verses that say otherwise, but the rest of the Bible speaks to my point.) But I don't want to accuse you of lawyering. I want to ask: What if Yahweh is universal? What then?

If you are correct in your assumption that Yahweh is a universal God, then you must leave space in your imagination for a concept of Divine Logos or Cosmic Christ. These are terms coined by philosopher John Hick. According to Hick, there is one divine force but it is understood somewhat differently according to who perceives it. Although different peoples perceive the same divine force, they interpret it through the lens of their particular culture. According to Hick's reasoning, the Hindu Brahman, the Chinese Tao, and Yahweh are actually the same entity. This is problematic though if it is true. Most Christians would outright reject this. ("Their god is not MY God.") But if they do, aren't they demonstrating how "finite" their god really is? Hick's conception is really the only way of seeing God as a universal figure. Otherwise he is understood as finite... related to a particular culture to serve a particular purpose.

I don't believe in universalism. I believe, based on the OT examples I listed as well as passages like:

Quote:"The truth about God is known to them instinctively. God has put this knowledge in their hearts. From the time the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky and all that God made. They can clearly see his invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse whatsoever for not knowing God" (Romans 1:19-20, New Living Translation)

that God gives people special information and then judges people's hearts according to the information they have and what they did with it. This would apply to anyone anywhere at any times--including Chinese and aboriginal Australians. That does not mean that sincere adherence to some other religion can get you into heaven. It has to do with an internal specific response to God as he makes a truth or truths known to a person. This also means when you have heard and understand the Christian gospel message, your response to that specific truth is what you will be judged on--it being the most complete of all the truths that God could show you. The Catholic's have the doctrine of Invincible Ignorance which amounts to the same thing. 

It is clear in the OT and the NT that God's work in Israel was not because he liked Israel--it was because he chose them as the vehicle to bring about the salvation of the world. That was the promise to Abraham from the beginning (Genesis 16:16 and following) and was reiterated several times along the way. His special relationship with them was a result of having to preserve a people, tradition, and religious philosophy/foundation long enough to get the conditions he wanted for the events of the NT.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Are Atheists using Intellectually Dishonest Arguments? - by SteveII - March 13, 2018 at 11:43 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Arguments (Certainty vs. Probability) JAG 12 1035 October 8, 2020 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Sal
  Best arguments for or against God's existence mcc1789 22 3056 May 22, 2019 at 9:16 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency datc 386 43393 December 1, 2017 at 2:07 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Valid Arguments for God (soundness disputed) Mystic 17 2229 March 25, 2017 at 2:54 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Arguments for God from a purely philosophical perspective Aegon 13 3025 January 24, 2016 at 2:44 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Hume weakened analogical arguments for God. Pizza 18 6093 March 25, 2015 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  Gaps in theistic arguments. Secular theism vs religious theism Pizza 59 10996 February 27, 2015 at 12:33 am
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Using the arguments against actual infinites against theists Freedom of thought 4 2279 May 14, 2014 at 12:58 am
Last Post: Freedom of thought
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 5719 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  What Arguments from Opposing Worldviews Give You Pause? MindForgedManacle 3 1139 November 15, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Last Post: Zazzy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)