RE: The Rights disdain of Hillary, where does it come from?
March 15, 2018 at 1:54 pm
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2018 at 2:10 pm by A Theist.)
(March 15, 2018 at 11:25 am)wallym Wrote:Trump campaigned on the things that Manchin and Lamb support in their States as well as the blue collar workers they represent. They don't like NAFTA, they support the President's tariffs, .....but, like you said, we'll find out how much he distances himself from Pelosi once he takes his seat in Congress.(March 15, 2018 at 10:59 am)A Theist Wrote: Won't work in the Rust Belt and Coal States. Dems will probably have to put up more moderate candidates like Lamb and Manchin if they hope to win back the voters there. The more left leaning candidates will do better in the coastal states like California and New York.
If the Lamb guy keeps his word, and is willing to negotiate like Manchin, maybe a slew of guys like that is just what the country needs.
(March 15, 2018 at 1:02 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(March 15, 2018 at 9:44 am)Grandizer Wrote: She won the popular vote (leading by around 3 million votes). You said she didn't have any redeeming qualities, and yet the majority of voters must have thought differently. I think what's happening here is simply that you don't like the woman (that's alright, it's not like I'm the biggest fan of her), and you rationalize this by arguing she had no redeeming qualities, when she wasn't worse in terms of policies or personality than her husband or the previous two POTUSes.
Hillary won the popular vote in 20 States. She lost the popular vote in 30 States. She could have gotten every single vote in the States she won and she would have lost the election.
When will people understand how the Presidential election system works in America?
(March 15, 2018 at 10:59 am)A Theist Wrote: Won't work in the Rust Belt and Coal States. Dems will probably have to put up more moderate candidates like Lamb and Manchin if they hope to win back the voters there. The more left leaning candidates will do better in the coastal states like California and New York.If the politicians won't support the party platform why should they be elected? I know the main reason they run for office is so that they can get rich but they do have to do a few things for the dummies once in a while.
You could also say, if the politicians put their party platform over the people they're supposed to represent why should voters elect them to political office?
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.