(March 17, 2018 at 4:38 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(March 17, 2018 at 2:20 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: There is nothing wrong with that. I don't deny that he said he was an atheist, nor does he have to give some exposition as to why. However if someone is pointing to his atheism as to some grander indication of what is the objective truth of the matter, then I think it is fair to ask why. Don't you?
I don't think anybody claimed that his atheism was some grander indication of what is objective truth of the matter, and I've just gone through the entire thread.
Would you mind quoting where anyone said as much? Otherwise, I'm calling bullshit.
If that is your position...good! I agree. If everyone agrees, then very good. If you need to declare some kind of victory and call bullshit... so be it. I’m not going to fight with you about something meaningless.
As I said before to bring up his atheism.... if he or another is making a claim, the the question is why. If they are not making some kind of claim, then the question is why is that important.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
