Jesus : The Early years

[Abaddon_ire]

Well, we currently have you claiming that only you are correct. Fine. I have no reason to accept that.

We have others claiming that allah is the only way.

We have others claiming some rather strangeness.

What makes your claim better? To me it is simply another woo claim among many others.  what exactly makes your claim special? What evidence have you to show for it that should convince me? So far, you seem to have not a damn thing, but I am willing to board whatever you have to offer for your arbitrarily chosen deity as opposed to any of the others competing so long as you can show that your deity exist. Perhaps you will be the first to do so. Nobody ever has before.

What I have presented has been accepted for 2000 years,

False.

none of it has ever been disproved

False.

nor will it because if it can't be for 2000 years there's no hope it will now.

False

As for allah he was imagined 600 years after Jesus.

Mithras predated jebus.  Had you a point?

God has not asked me nor any other Christian to prove Him,

Sorry, bible says you are wrong.

not even the Bible tries to prove God,

Wrong.

you want proof you will need to get it like I did, from God himself.

GC

Lie.

We know that the books that were included also contain falsehoods.

You claim that we know the books in the bible contain falsehoodsWe also know that the books I mentioned were accepted as valid for centuries and that they predate the books you accept. If you reject the two books I mentioned then you must apply the same criteria to the other gospels.

 No I don't. Those books are not accepted [/quote]Not accepted by whom? RCC? Council of Nicea? You? Some pastor you like?

and as far as predating anything I've never seen proof of it and even if they were that doesn't qualify them as reliable and true.

Amusing. As an atheist, it seems I know more than you about your "holey babble".

All of the Bible is true and has never been disproved,

No, that is absolutely false. The bible account has been demonstrated to be made from whole cloth.

if you have information it's false then you need to present it since no one else here has in all the time I've been here.

Hatloads of the claimed events in the bible never happened. I have no idea which you want to start with. How about the fact that both Gen:1 and Gen: 2 cannot agree? Or the endless NT begats cannot agree in the NT? Or Moses and the exodus was not recorded by Moses but never happened?

Great scholars put together the Bible from all the manuscripts of 2000 years past and many scholars have proved it reliable since. The 2000 years I use is a general time line to keep from looking up precise dates.

False. Religious cranks have claimed it's accuracy, but they are always trivially proven wrong. For example, are bats birds or mammals? Do insects have 4 or 6 legs? And so on. The bible gets so much comprehensively wrong it is funny.

Who do you think Gabriel was sent to, hint, Mary and who do you think Elizabeth was, hint, Mary's aunt. Come on man surely you can do better than this, read all the gospel first.

Read it. It is quite obvious that "mary" was simply making up any darn thing to avoid being stoned to death.

Dude, my first post in this thread quotes this passage. And no, it doesn't say what you claim it says. You're making shit up. Admit it.

 I can't help you deny the truth even when you post it. I making nothing up it is what it is and you can't change it.

Who cares? You are denying what the holey babble actually says.

You can't prove what I said is wrong or you would have, all you know to do is run your mouth so that you can disguise the lack of Biblical knowledge you have a trick I've seen here many, many times. 

Amusingly, atheists as a rule actually have read the bible and you appear to have not done so.