RE: Trump Adminstration Pushes Abstinence Only Sex Education
April 6, 2018 at 7:21 pm
(This post was last modified: April 6, 2018 at 7:45 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
I can't think of anything more immoral than pushing the idea that condoms are bad. Condoms are perhaps the greatest invention and product of all time. Less deadly diseases and less people born to suffer in a shitty world! The greatest possible win-win for well-being all in one.
^
Condoms are fantastic. Even better than abortions!
I guess they're unique and I guess that's why not everybody can be a porn actor.
It may also explain why many male porn actors are ugly as sin... being good looking isn't the priority for male porn stars.... having a magic penis that needs no atmosphere is, lol. There's even porn stars with not especially big dicks, but they can all keep going forever lol. It's like they're just horny all the time.
Hmm. Maybe I SHOULD get into the porn biz
(April 6, 2018 at 12:26 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(April 6, 2018 at 12:22 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I like the idea of teaching and encouraging abstinence to teenage kids as the only 100% safe option against both pregnancy and STD's. But I still think contraceptives should be tought so that the kids know what they are and how they work, etc. I'm pretty sure even when I was in Catholic grade school, we were taught in health class about all the different contraceptives and how they work. It doesn't mean the kids are being encouraged to have sex, it's just a regular part of learning about sexuality and health.
Well yeah, I don't think there's a health class in the United States that doesn't mention abstinence being 100% effective - it's just that abstinence-only programs almost invariably misrepresent or straight up lie about the effectiveness of other methods (if they mention them at all). Pushers of abstinence-only programs seem to think that young adults simply won't have sex if you tell them not to, which is laughably untrue. It's no coincidence that areas with abstinence-only programs are also the areas with the highest rates of STDs, unwanted pregnancies, and abortion.
^
(April 6, 2018 at 12:31 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(April 6, 2018 at 12:26 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Well yeah, I don't think there's a health class in the United States that doesn't mention abstinence being 100% effective - it's just that abstinence-only programs almost invariably misrepresent or straight up lie about the effectiveness of other methods (if they mention them at all). Pushers of abstinence-only programs seem to think that young adults simply won't have sex if you tell them not to, which is laughably untrue. It's no coincidence that areas with abstinence-only programs are also the areas with the highest rates of STDs, unwanted pregnancies, and abortion.
I'd rather teenage kids not have sex with each other at all. But if they do, I'd rather them use a condom than get pregnant and possibly have an abortion.
Condoms are fantastic. Even better than abortions!
(April 6, 2018 at 1:13 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I sometimes wonder how porn actors can do it by will. I need atmosphere.
I guess they're unique and I guess that's why not everybody can be a porn actor.
It may also explain why many male porn actors are ugly as sin... being good looking isn't the priority for male porn stars.... having a magic penis that needs no atmosphere is, lol. There's even porn stars with not especially big dicks, but they can all keep going forever lol. It's like they're just horny all the time.
Hmm. Maybe I SHOULD get into the porn biz
