Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions

[Pat Mustard]

I get the feeling that perhaps skeptics reject paranormal findings and experiments at first glance. They don't bother to fully read into the things these paranormal researchers have to say which addresses any objections these skeptics have. When you disagree with something whether it be an idea, an experiment, or a certain claim, you should fully look into anything that addresses your objections. Otherwise, you would just be jumping to conclusions. When drawing a certain conclusion, you should do so only after having conducted full research and having read all the objections being addressed. In short, keep an open mind through the whole journey until you finally arrive at the final destination whether that destination be accepting paranormal claims and findings as truth or rejecting them as woo or nonsense.

We reject that bullshit because a) it is unevidenced and b) there are literally mountains of evidence that the vast majority of the peddlers of said bullshit know they're lying (and they're not subtle or clever about it either, google Derek Acorah some time).