Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2026, 10:34 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Here's why Creatards might be right
#1
Here's why Creatards might be right
Reply
#2
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
I'm a bit confused how and why you jump from philosophy of science to whether abiogenesis is possible, and back. The two issues don't seem to have much in common.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#3
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
(October 27, 2015 at 6:44 am)Quantum Wrote: I'm a bit confused how and why you jump from philosophy of science to whether abiogenesis is possible, and back. The two issues don't seem to have much in common.

I don't like that username
Reply
#4
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
Atheists are shit idiots and they are wrong about everything: See below for further confirmation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvVYxehs1GU
Reply
#5
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
I think you need to change the water in your bong.
Reply
#6
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
They can't be right because their "explanations" are so vague as to be meaningless. They can be summed up by "magic". No matter what we eventually find out, they can point at it and say, "That's what I meant".

Since many creationists make claims contrary to well established scientific knowledge, they can't be completely right anyway.

Science is just honest enough to admit to its own limitations. Making up stories based on nothing adds nothing. Saying we don't know is just fine. Anything else is an argument from ignorance; which is 99% of religion anyway.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#7
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
(October 27, 2015 at 6:53 am)houseofcantor Wrote: I think you need to change the water in your bong.

Yep.But I'm right though aren't I?
Stones fell down before gravity was discovered.
Gravity isn't a real thing though,it's made up.
Gravity isn't a real thing but what is an attempt to explain why stones fell down.
So when we say that gravity was discovered what we mean is - an explanation as to why stones came down to earth was discovered.
I mean like,science is never going to find out the ^source^ (if you know what I mean,i.e,how gravity came to be or how motion came to be or how anything came to be.)
It's simply not possible.any
ting ting ting ting *Predesigned world*

I'm not saying that an intelligent being predesigned our world.Just that It was predesigned.But who would be capable of designing a complex structure anyway?

(Also I have this theory that if the earth is the result of the big bang then the nearest planets of earth should also exhibit the features of earth.I thought about this after looking at how when I heated oil and it would pop then some popping would be localized to that region.)
Reply
#8
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
What the hell does "predesigned" mean, that it was designed before it was designed?
Reply
#9
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
It was designed before execution.

Like you would know there are three phases to any system to come into being:

1) Design of system
2) Implementation of system
3) Execution of system
Reply
#10
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
Science doesn't make anything do anything. Science is a method of discovery.

One of the things science discovers is in the realm of physics, where the mathematics of particle and energy interactions becomes chemistry, which becomes biology.

There is no purpose behind it, just the mathematics of particle interactions. All the rest of that "function" you fill in with your pattern-seeking brain.

Now, you can quibble about science as a method, and suggest that there should be some refinement to the way in which the search for what is already happening is conducted, but the age of the universe, the fact of evolution and common descent, and gravity are extremely well-understood phenomena (gravity still needs a little work).
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Science and Theism Doesn't Work out right? Hellomate1234 28 7987 November 7, 2024 at 8:12 am
Last Post: syntheticadrenaline
Lightbulb Here is why you should believe in God. R00tKiT 112 37705 April 11, 2020 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Here’s Why You SHOULDN’T Believe In God BrianSoddingBoru4 46 13398 April 5, 2020 at 8:03 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions Transcended Dimensions 357 128273 April 27, 2018 at 7:14 am
Last Post: polymath257
  Why am I here? Mystic 51 21114 April 3, 2018 at 8:05 am
Last Post: Mystic
  I enjoy far right atheists more than lgbt marxist atheists Sopra 4 3785 February 28, 2018 at 9:09 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  A Question of Dropped Pennies: How Might an Atheist Respond? Rhondazvous 33 15139 July 5, 2017 at 4:30 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  The Right Question Tangra 40 9419 November 17, 2016 at 4:04 pm
Last Post: AceBoogie
  What is the right definition of agnostic? Red_Wind 27 10819 November 7, 2016 at 11:43 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  2014 article in online science journal: "Atheists Might Not Exist" Whateverist 15 7029 July 4, 2016 at 9:06 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)