RE: Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions
April 7, 2018 at 10:52 pm
(This post was last modified: April 7, 2018 at 10:53 pm by Whateverist.)
(April 7, 2018 at 4:46 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Khem is too gnostic for my liking. Granted... he's gnostic about the plausible things, which speaks to his benefit, but he's suspicious about a mind that's open to all possibilities (ie critical of agnosticism). That's too anti-Socratic for my tastes, and I challenge him on it when it pops up.
Yep. (Fixed that for you.) I'm more cautious/tentative/mealymouthed .. what's the word I'm looking for? Viva la difference!
(April 7, 2018 at 10:33 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote:(April 7, 2018 at 10:21 pm)Fireball Wrote: OK, keep up with that critical thinking! Be sure to apply it to all information you receive, and you'll be good to go with your life.
But there are many things I know as obvious facts. But then there are things that require much research into. The paranormal is one of these things that requires much researching into.
It almost seems that the paranormal is a necessary category from your perspective. Why?
