Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions

[Transcended Dimensions]

Skeptics claim they have the evidence while claiming that the paranormal researchers have no evidence.  But the paranormal researchers would claim they have the evidence and that the skeptics have none.  As you can see here, it is a debate regarding the evidence.  Therefore, it requires full research into these fields of study in order to determine whether there really is sufficient evidence for the paranormal or not.

Wouldn't evidence alone be sufficient ?

But how would you know if there is evidence for sure or not unless you fully research into these things and arrive at the final conclusion?