Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions

[Pat Mustard]

Just so you know, I can read anything anyone has to say here in regards to why they think the paranormal doesn't exist.  But, for each and every single one of these posts people make, I would always find myself asking the question:

"What are the objections to what these people are saying?"

Thus, nothing anybody says here will convince me because I would have to do full research into these objections and I would have to do much researching in general until I arrive at the final destination.  As a matter of fact, I apply this exact same mindset when determining the truth of any given thing.  But there are exceptions such as the fact that, if you drink poison, that would be lethal for you.  I obviously know not to drink poison.

I call bullshit on your second paragraph. You take as true too many things shown to be false and reject too many things strongly supported by evidence. The substance of what you do and believe is diametrically opposed to what you say you do.