(September 3, 2011 at 10:55 pm)KichigaiNeko Wrote: errr...
quick interrupt here Fred...you asked what constitutes "proof" you were given two, written references from contempories and archological evidence. Apart from these so called holy txts there is no evidence
That's exactly what I'm seeking to determine. What constitutes proof/evidence? It seems odd to insist there's no evidence when there's not even a consensus as to what it even is. That's why atheism seems as dogmatic as the religions it dismisses.