Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions

[Silver]

Reasoning and logic are the scientific method.  Show me where reasoning and logic fit into the paranormal paradigm.  Yes, they claim.  Claiming is not the same as scientific backing.  

OMG, you're dense.  I can claim and freaking thing, such as unicorns squatting in my basement.  A freaking claim, without scientific backing, is merely a claim.  These paranormal claims; that's just it, they're nothing more than claims.

Being open minded has nothing to do with it, because anyone with an open mind about absolutely anything will accept anything based on a mere claim rather than a scientific backing.

At this point, I don't know what more to say.  The paranormal researchers would claim that they do, in fact, have scientific backing while you are claiming they don't.  This is where I have to remain undecided since I just don't know one way or the other and it doesn't matter what anyone says to me.  The only way for me to know for sure is for me to do full research like I have mentioned many times here.  But, like I said earlier, I have no interest in doing this research.  I just simply came here to inform the skeptics that perhaps they are just being close minded and need to do full research before jumping to conclusions.

You don't have to remain undecided.

You can come to your own conclusions based on your own experience.  Have you witnessed any actual paranormal activities whereby the only explanation is that it was a paranormal activity?  The problem is that most people who claim paranormal experience denounce the fact that there is natural explanation that discounts their experience.  Their personal experience trumps reality, for whatever stupid reason.