Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions

[possibletarian]

*bold mine*

What full research would you like to do, that has not already been done ?
Can you be specific ?

I don't plan on doing any research since I have no interest.  I am just saying that, in order for me to arrive at the truth as to whether the skeptics are right or the paranormal researchers are right, then that would require me to do full research into both the skeptical field, the paranormal field, as well as all the objections being said and addressed by both sides of the debate.

That is not how you come to good conclusions, if you feel the 'paranormal' has merit, then it's that you should seek to prove, how much more simple can it get?

It's a bit like me saying that in order to come to a true conclusion about invisible immaterial flying pigs, then an investigation into those asking for evidence is a way to go, I've never heard of such nonsense. I would suggest that you do your own investigations, take the long path to your truth and return when you have something worthwhile to debate.