Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions

[KevinM1]

Onto page 19 and TD still hasn't clearly presented an example of skeptics being the incorrect shitheads he all but claims we are.

"What if you're wrong?" is the kind of BS theists use on weak minds.  If we're wrong, show us some data.

Again, shit, or get off the pot.

What I'm saying here is that, if you are going to make a decision in life over a topic that has a lot of debate, then you should never do so by using a shortcut method.  That would be the incorrect method.  It is a very simple, limiting, and close-minded approach to arriving at what you think is the truth.  Skeptics and paranormal researchers use this method.  As a matter of fact, humanity in general limits themselves with this method.

'Has a lot of debate' needs to be qualified.

You've yet to give anyone a reason to change their minds.  Chastising people for thinking and acting 'incorrectly' is hardly compelling, especially since that's all you've done in this thread.

Instead of simply asserting we're wrong, illustrate it.  Otherwise, stop whining about it.

---

Onto page 19 and TD still hasn't clearly presented an example of skeptics being the incorrect shitheads he all but claims we are.

"What if you're wrong?" is the kind of BS theists use on weak minds.  If we're wrong, show us some data.

Again, shit, or get off the pot.

But, what if you're wrong?

It never happens