(April 11, 2018 at 12:26 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Public ridicule is a thing. See: Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham.
Then the question becomes who is using the science improperly and being ridiculed. Is it Dean Radin and his research or is it the skeptics/materialists and their views/research? Are the materialists who claim there is no paranormal psuedo skeptics as paranormal researchers claim? Or is it the paranormal researchers such as Dean Radin who are the pseudo skeptics?