Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions

[polymath257]

Public ridicule is a thing.  See: Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham.

Then the question becomes who is using the science improperly and being ridiculed.  Is it Dean Radin and his research or is it the skeptics/materialists and their views/research?  Are the materialists who claim there is no paranormal psuedo skeptics as paranormal researchers claim?  Or is it the paranormal researchers such as Dean Radin who are the pseudo skeptics?

If you did an iota of research, you would know.

But you clearly don't want to know enough to find out.

You also clearly don't want to inform yourself enough to actually have an *informed discussion*.

Yet you want to claim others *may* have made up their minds too hastily. With, I might add, no evidence or research to back up even that claim.

And *that* makes you a troll.