RE: Testing a Hypothesis about the Supernatural
April 12, 2018 at 6:40 am
(This post was last modified: April 12, 2018 at 6:45 am by bennyboy.)
I'm curious if QM statistical outcomes can be called supernatural. If you cannot establish a specific mechanism for outcome, then on what basis will a particle be in position x rather than position y? Will we just call the unknowable "brute fact, but clearly physical," or will we accept the possibility that at the most fundamental level, there is a tremendous agnostic hole?
What, exactly, is the conceptual basis for separating natural from supernatural?
What, exactly, is the conceptual basis for separating natural from supernatural?