Yeah I know. I just wonder why the format IS like that. It's interesting - but I think I'd perhaps rather him finish up - it would have only took a second.
Five minutes, sure. To the very second? - Hmm...interesting - but I think if it only takes a second it would be better to let the interviewee finish what they were saying I would think...
I wonder why they DO do it like that? Why does it have to be to the very second? It's interesting, but is it really better then letting them finish and only taking a tiny bit longer?
Is it all just basically for the humour and fun of it, for a light interview? Or is there actually more to a point to it than that?
EvF
Five minutes, sure. To the very second? - Hmm...interesting - but I think if it only takes a second it would be better to let the interviewee finish what they were saying I would think...
I wonder why they DO do it like that? Why does it have to be to the very second? It's interesting, but is it really better then letting them finish and only taking a tiny bit longer?
Is it all just basically for the humour and fun of it, for a light interview? Or is there actually more to a point to it than that?
EvF