Oh no not another free will thread.

[Edwardo Piet]

I'm being a little bit lazy here, not having read 15 pages of undoubtedly brilliant philosophizing.

I'd define free will like this: It is the unfettered expression of the self in behavior.

This obviously cannot include variation in a given moment.  You could not have made a different decision, because any decision other than the one you made would not have been a maximally perfect expression of the self.

Right. So it sounds like you accept compatabilism then.

I believe compatabilism is true, but I'm not a compatabilist because I think that the label "free will" in those cases is misleading at best and harmful at worst.

To put it simply, I demand more of free will.

And the label "free will" is the epitome of a loaded term, for me. We're better of without it.