(May 17, 2009 at 1:12 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Well Dawkins covered evidence so why shouldn't he cover non empirical evidence??
Because it can't be evidence for anything UNLESS it's empirical and thus measurable and/or verifiable (at least potentially so).
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
