Civility subsection suggestion

[Ravenshire]

In a serious discussion, you show that a person is dishonest, deluded, or ignorant with facts.

You didn't answer the question. Typically in these sorts of discussion, the dishonest, deluded, or ignorant person will simply ignore such evidence and continue on in the same fashion. Should dishonest, deluded, or ignorant people be banned from such threads after evidence has been provided?

(emphasis is mine)

This is a great question because these things are far greater blocks to serious discussion than any amount of swearing or name calling ever will be.