(May 5, 2018 at 1:05 pm)Tiberius Wrote: So having skimmed the last few pages, it seems like people would be happier if they were able to swear to emphasize a point, but not if it’s being used to attack / insult someone.
So essentially a forum where we have a stricter enforcement of flaming, would that suffice or are there other rules it would need?
Ok, so I read through the official forum rules. I would say the civility section should be a stricter less tolerant enforcement of the prime directive rule, the flaming rule, and the trolling rule.
I think those 3 cover everything that would aim to make for a more productive discussion: general civility, no name calling/cussing people out, no baiting/provocation (including blatant repeated strawmen), no random pointless posts made specifically for the purpose of mockery or whatever, and staying on topic.
That's my opinion, though we can certainly loosen it up a bit to make things more practical for moderation purposes or whatever.
I propose that it be a request only subforum where everyone can read but you have to request to join and agree to the rules/conditions to be able to post.
The thread titles for that section should show up in a distinctive color.
Rule vilolators should initially get warnings, then get temporarily banned from the section, then get permabanned from the section.
^Again, all this being my suggestion/proposition. Tweak as necessary.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh