RE: To theists- A logical insight into Atheism
May 15, 2018 at 10:40 am
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2018 at 10:46 am by Huggy Bear.)
(May 15, 2018 at 1:20 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(May 13, 2018 at 4:32 am)Huggy74 Wrote: You obviously don't get my point.How does a star that's initially composed of nothing but hydrogen atoms produce other elements such as oxygen, iron, and gold?
If you claim that life began through abiogenesis, THEN YOU ARE CLEARLY NOT SAYING YOU DONT KNOW HOW LIFE BEGAN.
My point is how can you even claim abiogenesis in the first place when there is not one shred of evidence?
THIEST: Life began therefore God
ATHEIST: Life exists so therefore abiogenesis
Again how are you any different from a so-called fundie?
What does this have to do with life?
(May 14, 2018 at 12:04 am)ignoramus Wrote: 50% of our jink dna is the same as yeast. Remnants of billions of years of evolution.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...131659.htm
Quote:Researchers at the University of Michigan Life Sciences Institute and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute have determined how satellite DNA, considered to be "junk DNA," plays a crucial role in holding the genome together.
Their findings, published recently in the journal eLife, indicate that this genetic "junk" performs the vital function of ensuring that chromosomes bundle correctly inside the cell's nucleus, which is necessary for cell survival. And this function appears to be conserved across many species.
This pericentromeric satellite DNA consists of a very simple, highly repetitive sequence of genetic code. Although it accounts for a substantial portion of our genome, satellite DNA does not contain instructions for making any specific proteins. What's more, its repetitive nature is thought to make the genome less stable and more susceptible to damage or disease. Until fairly recently, scientists believed this so-called "junk" or "selfish" DNA did not serve any real purpose.
"But we were not quite convinced by the idea that this is just genomic junk," said Yukiko Yamashita, research professor at the LSI and lead author on the study. "If we don't actively need it, and if not having it would give us an advantage, then evolution probably would have gotten rid of it. But that hasn't happened."
Breakthrough study overturns theory of 'junk DNA' in genome
Quote:Long stretches of DNA previously dismissed as "junk" are in fact crucial to the way our genome works, an international team of researchers said on Wednesday.