I repeat the same answers to the questions because I think they're still relevant and you're either ignoring them/responding with bare assertions/misunderstanding them it seems, etc.
I gave explanations.
If I were truthful? LMAO! I AM being truthful believe me!
I gave my reasons why the bible is no more evidence for God than the FSM Gospel is for the FSM (because what reason do I have to think otherwise? WHY should I give God special treatment?) but you simply say it's bollocks. I gave MY reasons - you simply dismiss it with a bare assertion that it's "bollocks".
Who's the one not giving their reasons THERE then?
My repetition WOULD be a banal assertion except that I GAVE my reasons so it's not one. Since AT LEAST on that one post you simply said it was "bollocks" - that's a bare assertion. There is no reasoning communicated simply by the word "Bollocks".
However I simply said that the Bible is no more proof of "God" than the FSM Gospel is of the FSM.
Why? Because what reason is there to think otherwise?! AS I have said: Why should I give God special treatment? I should treat him the same as the FSM untill I have any reason to think otherwise! They're both extraordinary claims that demand extraordinary evidence.
EvF
I gave explanations.
If I were truthful? LMAO! I AM being truthful believe me!
I gave my reasons why the bible is no more evidence for God than the FSM Gospel is for the FSM (because what reason do I have to think otherwise? WHY should I give God special treatment?) but you simply say it's bollocks. I gave MY reasons - you simply dismiss it with a bare assertion that it's "bollocks".
Who's the one not giving their reasons THERE then?
My repetition WOULD be a banal assertion except that I GAVE my reasons so it's not one. Since AT LEAST on that one post you simply said it was "bollocks" - that's a bare assertion. There is no reasoning communicated simply by the word "Bollocks".
However I simply said that the Bible is no more proof of "God" than the FSM Gospel is of the FSM.
Why? Because what reason is there to think otherwise?! AS I have said: Why should I give God special treatment? I should treat him the same as the FSM untill I have any reason to think otherwise! They're both extraordinary claims that demand extraordinary evidence.
EvF
