I did both.
![[Image: pcgraphpng.php?ec=-4.38&soc=-5.79]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.politicalcompass.org%2Ffacebook%2Fpcgraphpng.php%3Fec%3D-4.38%26amp%3Bsoc%3D-5.79)
A big factor in my change from before is that I focused on harm done, decided that charity is too limited and unscaled to properly address what a global social safety net should be (targeted to those who need it without running afoul of the bigotries of certain charitable organizations (Salvation Army I'm looking at you)), saw no issue with propping up a museum if the public wishes to pay taxes for it and saw only minor issues with corporations, as long as they're regulated closely.
Nolan:
A big factor in my change from before is that I focused on harm done, decided that charity is too limited and unscaled to properly address what a global social safety net should be (targeted to those who need it without running afoul of the bigotries of certain charitable organizations (Salvation Army I'm looking at you)), saw no issue with propping up a museum if the public wishes to pay taxes for it and saw only minor issues with corporations, as long as they're regulated closely.
Nolan:
![[Image: chart.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa262%2Fcoredump%2Fchart.png)
Slave to the Patriarchy no more