Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 1, 2024, 7:17 am

Poll: How do you account for psychopaths?
This poll is closed.
I don’t believe God is responsible for our morality
50.00%
4 50.00%
I don’t accept that psychopaths really exist
0%
0 0%
Psychopaths are choosing to ignore their innate sense of right and wrong
0%
0 0%
God mistakenly misses out psychopaths when granting morality
0%
0 0%
It’s the psychopath’s fault they have no empathy
25.00%
2 25.00%
It’s because of “the fall”
0%
0 0%
Other
25.00%
2 25.00%
Total 8 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theists: how do you account for psychopaths?
RE: Theists: how do you account for psychopaths?
(May 28, 2018 at 7:49 am)SteveII Wrote: That is simply wrong. Reason are not either valid or invalid. Reasons are just statements of rationale.

Incorrect. Either you have a valid argument or you don't. There's also the matter of whether your premises are sound, of course. But assuming that your premises are indeed sound then your reasons certainly have to be valid. You can't just start with sound premises and then make non-sequiturs and expect to be considered rational. Non-sequiturs are the opposite of rational.

Quote: Take the murder example. My reasons are: increase my security, alleviate my suffering, or create some happiness for me. These are not invalid reasons.

What are your premises? And are they sound?

It makes no sense to start with a premise that says X is wrong for everyone else but not for me. Because you have absolutely no rational justification for special pleading.

Quote: It is your opinion that they are not sufficient reasons. Why? 

There's nothing wrong with your reasons as long as you accept that the same applies to everyone else and it's also wrong for you to murder others because it increases their suffering. Again, it is irrational to fall to special pleading. Bias is irrational: Like I said, this is why the veil of ignorance thought experiment is objective and fair.



Quote:Big time question begging. Again, answer the question why is causing the suffering of others wrong --especially since I might have reasons to do so. 

That's a nonsensical question as the axiom is that suffering is wrong in the first place. If you're asking me to prove that suffering is wrong that's just silly. Once we accept that needless suffering is, obviously, bad, then we can get objective answers to questions based on that.

In case you didn't know: All objective fields start with axioms.

Quote:Pointing out the subjective nature of morality is not special pleading.

That is not what I said. I said saying that the rules only apply to your suffering is special pleading. Why is your suffering any more special than anyone else's? You have absolutely no justification for such a bias. Either needless suffering is bad or it isn't.

Quote: You moved the goal post. I did not say "needless suffering".

I didn't move the goal post at all. The whole time I've been saying that needless suffering is bad. Yes, you did not say needless suffering. *I* said needless suffering.

Quote:I listed three reasons why and you have not told me why my reasons are wrong.

Yes I have. Because it's special pleading to say that only your suffering matters.

I said that needless suffering is bad, and your response was to say why shouldn't you only care about your own and no one else's. My response: Because you have no justification for that special pleading. If suffering is bad full stop it makes no sense to say it's only bad for you and not for anyone else.

Quote:Fair warning, if you do, I am going to ask why to whatever answer you give. 

I've already told you. If we accept that needless suffering is morally bad then it makes no sense to say that only yours is bad. That is bias and special pleading. If it's bad full stop it's bad for everyone, you'd need a justification to say that yours mattered more than everyone else's and you haven't got that justification.

Quote:The veil of ignorance is a political theory about rights of a group. I am 100% sure I can get away with murder. Why should I refrain?

You don't understand the veil of ignorance if you are going to dismiss it like that. The point is that by eliminating bias you are more objective and the best way to eliminate bias of all is to not know which person you are going to be when you are born into the world. Like I said, there's absolutely no justification for saying that one person's suffering matters more than another's... so to say that yours matters more needs a justification.

You should refrain from murder because it would cause suffering for yourself and others.

If you say you only care about your own. So what? Who cares what you care about? It's still wrong for you to make others to suffer as well. Like I said, you've got no justification whatsoever for considering yourself special. Everyone's self-interest matters to themselves. You aren't special. Everyone matters.



Messages In This Thread
RE: Theists: how do you account for psychopaths? - by Edwardo Piet - May 28, 2018 at 10:16 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Evolution cannot account for morality chiknsld 341 39935 January 1, 2023 at 10:06 pm
Last Post: sdelsolray
  Theists: What do you mean when you say that God is 'perfect'? Angrboda 103 19829 March 5, 2021 at 6:35 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Theists, please describe how you experience your god I_am_not_mafia 161 19029 June 15, 2018 at 9:37 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Theists, Who would You Rather Have as a Neighbor Rhondazvous 23 8210 November 10, 2017 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism? PETE_ROSE 455 113597 April 5, 2017 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: RoadRunner79
  The Biblical Account of the Creation - A new look RonaldMcRaygun 10 3230 March 31, 2017 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Theists: would you view the truth? robvalue 154 21322 December 25, 2016 at 2:29 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  Why are you Against Homosexuality (to theists) ScienceAf 107 18745 September 2, 2016 at 2:59 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Forum theists: when you have a moment, please... Athene 125 29414 October 27, 2015 at 11:09 am
Last Post: Mr Greene
  Theists, what does faith mean to you? Tartarus Sauce 133 35340 August 14, 2015 at 9:21 am
Last Post: Tartarus Sauce



Users browsing this thread: 29 Guest(s)