(June 2, 2018 at 1:38 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(June 2, 2018 at 1:29 pm)Drich Wrote: I think I got what I came here for. that being a cross section of people who think for themselves, verse atheists of "faith" I skimmed through the answers already and before I blow you all up one at a time, I want to first show you that only maybe one or two of you truly thinks for themselves. meaning they took the info provided and moved to discredit the info based on addressing the points made in the video or articles.
The rest of you are faith based atheists. meaing you simply hold on to the current model of what is considered 'truth/scientific fact' and refuse to challenge it unless your atheist culture were to move that way and provide you with the reasons why. Meaning you can not take new info annalize it andaccet or discredit it on your own. you are stuck in what you believe till a dawkins or someone of good standing in your community tells you what to think. then you will quote and paste his work even if it does not directly address what I had to say .... Why not take the info provided and show it is wrong rather than poo poo on a person? oh, that's right it's because you can't. you all literally can't do that as that is not how your atheistic society works. Your's is a belief built on peer pressure and populism. Why be what you demand all Christians to be when you can just make fun of what you do't like?
Like many a shallow thinker, you conflate "did not" with "can not". That someone did not do something on one occasion does not mean that they are incapable of doing so, nor that they have not done so outside of this specific context. Thus your conclusion does not follow.
well you just excused yourself from the list of 'thinker'
let me say first if I opened with this statement, meaning first time here. first post ever, and I drew these conclusions you'd be 100% correct.
but it's not my first time at bat here is it?
It's not my first go round with the same names, the same response the same people give over and over again. there is a huge difference between did not and can not. Do you honestly think after 6 or 7 years here, I can not make that distinction? In fact I most certainly did when I divided the room into people who can and did Identify the subject matter and addressed those point from those who just ad hom attack me for brig the story or authors of said stories.
Those who can make intelligent arguments do, (you did) those who can't, sling poop and scream loudly as their proud ancestors did. In their 'feeling' they think if they can get the mob to hate someone then whatever message the unpopular one has dies.. they do things this way because they do not know how to challenge facts.
People attack people rather than ides or facts because they can't. they are broken inside and can not allow emotions to go unchecked. they think with feeling, and not facts. they only pretend to use fact when a smarter person shows them how it may apply. but challenge those facts, without further instruction from the smarter person, they go back to attacking individuals and throwing their poo at them again, in an attempt to win the popular vote..
Which is the real point to this story.
You have facts you have scientific theory and approval, but because it works against your anti god narrative they hate this idea... because there is no direction from the broader community, the majority on faith (ignoring all the scientific data provided) try and win a popularity contest...
Which sums up what most atheist belief systems are based on.
Faith and popular culture. because when "Scientific fact turn on the coe belief" they turn on science.
