(June 2, 2018 at 1:45 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: The scientific answer is in an alternate dimension, meaning we die here and wake up there
Oh, that’s the “scientific” answer, Drich? Thanks for the laugh.
Btw, did you even bother to glance at page one of your google search results? Do you come up with stuff while jerking off with the other hand?
glob...
I did
I saw it and decided to go with it anyway. why?
because this is about the subject more than it is about how you 'good people' process the subject or did you miss that?
Meaning (for you campus indoctrinated thinkers) I gave you ammo not only to support my OP but to also scientificall refute it. why?
To see if you 'good people would use the "Facts" as an overwhelming way to shut me down... or would you just Ad Hom Ad hoc attack me and try and win a popularity cntest.
Do you get it now? or do I need to finish connecting all the dots and color it all in?
I got 3 pages of ad hoc attacks meaning: no one who was addressed the subject/op, care about the facts to use them (as again I provided them to both support and to refute..) all you people wanted to do was attack the messenger, which shows you all are not smart enough to defend a scientific position the refutes your core beliefs, (there is no God) which makes what you believe a matter of faith... Meaning you can only use science to defend a position that God and science can not mix, and when challenged you seek to use pop culture to refute a scientific explanation that would suggest otherwise.
Who's laughing now sport?
