RE: Muhammad the perv
June 3, 2018 at 11:05 am
(This post was last modified: June 3, 2018 at 11:08 am by WinterHold.)
Quote:Jörmungandr
(June 3, 2018 at 10:30 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: I didn't see a question TBH. More of a note to make
Two interpretations were offered. The natural question is which is correct. Given that the text is supposed to represent a communique from God and His messenger, I think the actual intent is as important as our independent contributions to its meaning. Especially given our contributions to its meaning.
The Quran stated that it has two types of verse: unspecific ones, and obvious ones. See this:
Quote:https://quran.com/3/7?translations=
Sahih International
Sura 3, The Quran:
(7) It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muhammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific. As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allah . But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding.
It is intended for the book to have unspecific verses.
The goal of this is in bald.
