Muhammad the perv

[Fake Messiah]

Hadiths should be only seen as tools to discover what Quran itself proves through it's own verses. Quran has everything we need, the Sunnah clarifies, if the family of the reminder is to be approached, it must be a long side the book of God, and verified by the book of God and enlightened by the family of Taha and Yaseen of what is in the Quran.

I will get hadiths from Ahlulbayt (as) that show everything is in Quran.

Hadiths are shown to verify that you aren't interpreting out of no where and that their is verification from Ahlulbayt (as) to that interpretation and legacy of knowledge but Quran must referred to as well.  They go together and cannot be sepearated.

You go to both thirsty, but never neglect or a twist a verse, to justify a fabricated hadiths because some idols say it's authentic and people attribute purity to those people without knowledge, and Ilmel Rijaal is conjecture through and through, and Quran forbids relying on conjecture.

Sure, and as we saw in 1st post Hadiths are used to justify necrophilia in Islam; also Hadiths were used by The Islamic Council to decide that because Aisha's still under-developed genitals were not capable of accommodating an adult penis, and after Muhammad's multiple failed penetrative efforts, Muhammad resorted to masturbating by placing his penis between her thighs, simulating a vagina (aka thighing).
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadi...g.22_Aisha

But of course this contradicts Sharia law because masturbating is considered a crime under Sharia law.

Nevertheless this doesn't bother you. What gets you off, especially Atlas, is that Hadiths describe him kissing and fantasizing about boys aka Muhammad being gay. I mean necrophilia and pedophilia sure but being gay is just a line you can't cross.