RE: The brain
June 5, 2018 at 9:42 am
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2018 at 9:44 am by Mystic.)
Not the original data, which goes with both theories, but additional data, that I have to study and see if it support it or doesn't.
It's circular - show me one philosopher today who knows what circular argument looks like and says it's not.
This is why a dialogue happens, about pragmatism, and science can really disprove theories, but never prove a theory, but you work with working models that work with data from pragmatism...
But it doesn't mean in the future, a different theory won't come a long and even be MORE useful in application.
(June 5, 2018 at 9:29 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Observation->hypothesis->experiment or prediction->hypothesis disconfirmed or tentatively supported.
So circular.
It's circular - show me one philosopher today who knows what circular argument looks like and says it's not.
This is why a dialogue happens, about pragmatism, and science can really disprove theories, but never prove a theory, but you work with working models that work with data from pragmatism...
But it doesn't mean in the future, a different theory won't come a long and even be MORE useful in application.
