8000 Muslims massacred by White, racist European non-Muslims. All Euro vs Euro

[WinterHold]

Well, Atlass, it was abhorring that the world did almost nothing during the Balkan wars, but, unlike you insinuate, it wasn't only a war against Muslims.

By 1995 Serbs massacres were a routine thing for Serbs and it didn't stop until US bombed Belgrade in 1999 and Belgrade should have been bombed back in 1991 when Serbs first started massacring people in Croatia which were not Muslims.

Here's a good explanation by Bill Clinton from his autobiography of what was happening there:

By 1991, Yugoslavia’s westernmost provinces, Slovenia and Croatia, both predominantly Catholic, had declared independence from Yugoslavia. Fighting then broke out between Serbia and Croatia, and spilled over into Bosnia. In 1991, the Bosnians were governed by a coalition of national unity headed by the leading Muslim politician, Alija Izetbegovic, and including the militant Serbian nationalist leader Radovan Karadzic, a Sarajevo psychiatrist.

At first Izetbegovic wanted Bosnia to be an autonomous multi-ethnic, multi-religious province of Yugoslavia. When Slovenia and Croatia were recognized by the international community as independent nations, Izetbegovic decided that the only way Bosnia could escape Serbian dominance was to seek independence, too. Karadzic and his allies, who were tied closely to Milosevic, had a very different agenda. They were supportive of Milosevic’s desire to turn as much of Yugoslavia as he could hold on to, including Bosnia, into a Greater Serbia.

On March 1, 1992, a referendum was held on whether Bosnia should become an independent nation in which all citizens and groups would be treated equally. The result was an almost unanimous approval of independence, but only two-thirds of the electorate voted. Karadzic had ordered the Serbs to stay away from the polls and most of them did. By then, Serb paramilitary forces had begun killing unarmed Muslims, driving them from their homes in Serb-dominated areas in the hope of carving up Bosnia into ethnic enclaves, or “cantons,” by force. This cruel policy came to be known by a curiously antiseptic name: ethnic cleansing.
The European Community envoy, Lord Carrington, tried to get the parties to agree to peacefully divide the country into ethnic regions but failed, because there was no way to do it without leaving large numbers of one group on land controlled by another, and because many Bosnians wanted to keep their country together, with the different groups living together in peace, as they had done successfully for most of the previous five hundred years.
In April 1992, the European Community recognized Bosnia as an independent state for the first time since the fifteenth century. Meanwhile, Serbian paramilitary forces continued to terrorize Muslim communities and kill civilians, all the while using the media to convince local Serbs that it was they who were under attack from the Muslims and who had to defend themselves.

To its credit, the Bush administration did urge the United Nations to impose economic sanctions on Serbia, a measure initially opposed by Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the French, and the British, who said they wanted to give Milosevic a chance to stop the very violence he had incited. Finally, sanctions were imposed in late May, but with little effect, as supplies continued to reach the Serbs from friendly neighbors. The United Nations also continued to maintain the arms embargo against the Bosnian government that originally had been imposed against all Yugoslavia in late 1991. The problem with the embargo was that the Serbs had enough weapons and ammunition on hand to fight for years; therefore, the only consequence of maintaining the embargo was to make it virtually impossible for the Bosnians to defend themselves. Somehow they managed to hold out throughout 1992, acquiring some arms by capturing them from Serb forces, or in small shipments from Croatia that managed to evade the NATO blockade of the Croatian coast.

Did you pay good attention to this part in particular:

Somehow they (Bosnians) managed to hold out throughout 1992, acquiring some arms by capturing them from Serb forces, or in small shipments from Croatia that managed to evade the NATO blockade of the Croatian coast.

So imagine that, Croatia supplied Bosnians (Muslims) with weapons. Croats and Serbs are both Christians and yet Croats rather helped Muslims to fight Christians (Serbs)!

I stressed a section from Clinton's statement that I think points strongly to the cultural problem some European white communities have with Islam and Muslims. The political goals of the Serb leaders are understandable, but to murder Muslims in specific on a scale this big requires years for the grudge and the hate to be ready.

In every ethnic cleansing around the world, there is always years of grudge and hate being "cooked". Take for example the "Sunni/Shiite" example in the Middle East.

I underlined one part: the Serbs bought the propaganda poured to them because of the grudge and hate. Personally; this is what I believe happened.
I don't know the motives of the Croats in the support of Bosnians; but I bet it is for an interest that the Croats seek. If the interest was with the Serbs; they would've did what the NATO did and prevented weapons from going in.

---

Atlas, the picture you posted was actually a common method of execution among the Mongols.  They had a taboo against the shedding of royal blood so they used "crushing" instead.  The most common variant of it was to wrap the condemned in a blanket or rug and ride their horses over him.  That normally did the trick.

The worst way to die is to die as a part of a ritual. Just shit, this "crushing" is a damn nightmare, too bad they didn't know that "bruises" are actually spilled blood; but under the skin