8000 Muslims massacred by White, racist European non-Muslims. All Euro vs Euro

[WinterHold]

I was telling you that "the fallen Muslim civilians" were lined up and killed  just because they were "a part of a certain ethnic group"; i.e they were ethnically cleansed.

You, on the other hand, are trying your best to picture this as if it was a "normal conflict with civilian casualties".

There is nothing normal about war. Serbian armies were roaming around trying to make Greater Serbia and came upon Srebrenica and other towns where people, because of the embargo, did not have weapons to defend themselves. While, as Clinton writes, in other parts of Bosnia there was a better situation because Croats and Muslims had some weapons to defend themselves despite the embargo:

By July, the fighting was in full swing again, with the Bosnian government forces making some gains in the middle of the country. Instead of trying to regain the lost territory, General Mladic decided to attack three isolated Muslim towns in eastern Bosnia, Srebrenica, Zepa, and Gorazde. The towns were filled with Muslim refugees from nearby areas, and though they had been declared UN safe areas, they were protected by only a small number of UN troops. Mladic wanted to take the three towns so that all of eastern Bosnia would be controlled by the Serbs, and he was convinced that, as long as he held UN peacekeepers hostage, the UN would not allow NATO to bomb in retaliation.

On July 10, the Serbs took Srebrenica. By the end of the month they had also taken Zepa, and refugees who escaped from Srebrenica had begun to tell the world of the horrifying slaughter of Muslims there by Mladic’s troops. Thousands of men and boys were gathered in a soccer field and murdered en masse. Thousands more were trying to escape through the heavily wooded hills.

Its arms embargo had kept the Bosnian government from achieving military parity with the Serbs. The peacekeepers could protect the Bosnian Muslims and Croatians only as long as the Serbs believed NATO would punish their aggression. Now the hostage-taking had erased that fear and given the Serbs a free hand in eastern Bosnia. The situation was slightly better in central and western Bosnia, because the Croatians and Muslims had been able to obtain some arms despite the UN embargo.

Of course there is more than one type of wars: a normal war and a "weird war".

1)A normal war is a conflict that involves people killing people to "achieve certain political goals". The normal war can end with the enemies turning friends.

2)Then, there is the "weird war". It is more of a slaughterhouse where pools of blood being spilled, and insane historical psychological problem being cloaked with populism and mad historical hatred and grudge from the killer towards the victim.

Many wars are a mixture of the two above categories.

An evil politician is the one who uses the second to achieve the first. In Bosnia, the second was used by the Serbs to achieve the first.

Back in the day, Hitler also used the second to achieve the first.

Achieve the political goal that you can't achieve by a normal war, through waging a "weird war" that involves extreme actions like massacring a whole race of people. Or 8000 of it, at least?