(June 13, 2018 at 1:39 pm)Drich Wrote:(June 13, 2018 at 1:22 pm)Mathilda Wrote: No it doesn't.
yahuh.. Kinda already proved that point beyond contestation and moved on. (lest you change the definition of the word transmitter and receiver.)
No you haven't. Not in the slightest.
I own this book for instance Principles of Neural Science. It's over two inches thick and is the standard textbook for everything brain. Nowhere does it say that the brain is a transmitter and receiver for consciousness and memories.
I've read the entirety of Biophysics of Computation. It is the bible of computational modelling of neurons. It goes into the smallest detail involving ion channels, voltages, cable resistance, secondary messengers for adaptive leakages etc. Nowhere does it say how neurons receive and signals outside of the brain.
Proving this would get you the Nobel prize. But they wouldn't just accept a youtube from a quackpot, an irrelevant page of google results and a youtube clip of someone controlling a remote controlled car using apparatus that can pick up electromagnetic brainwaves. They wouldn't even accept a single peer reviewed paper, which is far beyond your reach.
